Criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan and Election Commission:
Advocate Nazia is the best criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan for election commission cases. Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Arts 199 & 185(3) was invoked in the petition for leave to appeal. Order of High Court relating to the direction for registration of a case against the petitioner and others did not call for any interference as they were held responsible for keeping the detenue in illegal detention. Passing of an order relating to the suspension of the notification of the petitioner as Nazim of the Union Council while disposing of a petition under Section 49K Cr P.C was not proper according to the court. The criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan said that sending of reference to the Election Commission of Pakistan against the petitioner an elected member in case of misconduct would not be objectionable but the suspension of his notification would amount to interference in the functions of the Election Commission of Pakistan which had the exclusive jurisdiction of removal of an elected member from his office under the law if during his tenure he had earned a statutory disqualification.
Functions of Election Commission of Pakistan:
Suspension of such notification like temporary membership by the High Court would amount to direct interference in the functions of Election Commission of Pakistan a Constitutional Institution. High Court undoubtedly in the exercise of its powers under Art 199 of the Constitution could pass any interim order to regulate the proceedings in a case pending before it but the passing of an interim order in a matter relating to the jurisdiction of another constitutional Forum could not properly exercise of its discretion under the said Art 199—Petition for, leave to appeal was consequently converted into appeal and the impugned order relating to the suspension of the Notification of the petitioner was set aside as claimed by a criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan (2003 SCMR 17250). Detention of a person in proceedings under the Land Revenue Act (1967) cannot be termed as' illegal or improper detention for Section 491. Habeas corpus petition in such case dismissed leaving it open to petitioner/detenu to avail of remedy provided in Land Revenue Act SD 247).
Habeas Corpus Petitioner by a Criminal Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan;
Petitioner had sought his release from alleged illegal custody on the ground that he was Only a guarantor/surety of the original loanees and without initiating legal proceedings against the original borrowers the coercive measures had been adopted against the petitioner without observing the formalities under ss.82 & 24 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Borrowers and the other surety could not be traced and warrants of arrest of the petitioner under competent Authority had been filed by the Corporation nor determination of the amount of the arrears had been made by the Competent Authority under law. Determination of amount due by the competent authority has not been made as claimed by the criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. The provisions of law having been observed petition for habeas corpus was accepted by the High Court. (2003 YLR 1052(a). Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court. Vires of Constitution. High Court can exercise its powers under Art 199 of the Constitution to grant bail in appropriate cases.