Seek Advise By Constitutional Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan For Success in Lawsuit Proceeding

The Constitutional Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan:

 Advocate Nazia is the best Constitutional lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. In a constitutional case, Superior Courts have the power to grant bail under Article 199 of the Constitution independent of any statutory source of jurisdiction such as S. 497 Cr.P.C Section 9(b) of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 to that extent is ultra vires the Constitution. High Court under its Constitutional jurisdiction has unquestionably such power and should exercise this jurisdiction question of liberty of a citizen is involved Court has before it only an application under S, MLD 519). Habeas corpus petition was filed by Constitutional lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. Appellate Court had reduced the sentence of imprisonment of accused from seven years R.I. to three years R.I. with the benefit of 382B Cr.P.C. which he had already served out. Authorities had not taken into account three months for which the accused had remained in the custody of police for the same offense and which was to be counted towards his imprisonment as required by S382B CrP.C. Accused wais consequently directed to be released forthwith from jail.

Know About Habeas Corpus Petition:

The petition was allowed YLR 1026).  Habeas corpus petition Forfeiture of surety bonds through a constitutional lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. Remission entitled detenue who stood surety in thirteen different cases had furnished bail bonds as surety. Accused released on bail absconded in all the thirteen cases and proceedings under S, 514 Cr.P.C was initiated against detenu by different Courts on different dates, Since detenue was unable to pay penalty imposed in any of the cases he was imprisoned for various terms on different dates. Period of detention in eight cases had expired whereas in remaining cases detention period had yet to be completed. Since the order of imprisonment under SS 14(4) CrP.C against detenu was not made in consequence of conviction it could not be termed as a sentence.

Information Related to The S. 514(4). Cr. P.C:

Prisoner imprisoned by order under S. 514(4) Cr.P.C was not entitled to be benefited from remission granted either under Prison rules or by order of President of Pakistan under Art-45 of Constitution. Detenu though was not entitled to remissions claimed by him but in circumstance of the case, it was directed that his period of imprisonment in cases that he had been detained under orders made under S. 514(4). Cr. P.C. would be considered to run concurrently and not consecutively and in five remaining cases, a period of detention had yet to expire on the basis that periods of imprisonment were considered to run consecutively. The constitutional lawyer in Lahore Pakistan claimed that the Period of imprisonment imposed in favor of said cases was six months each and one month in one case. Taking the period of imprisonment concurrently last period of imprisonment of six had already expired. The Superintendent of Jail was directed to set detenu at liberty. (PLD 2005 Pesh. 112).  Leave to appeal trough Constitutional lawyer in Lahore Pakistan was granted by Supreme Court to consider whether the proceedings in the habeas corpus petition as a whole were maintainable in the-facts and circumstances of the case.